Within weeks of retaking the White House, President Donald Trump boasted that he had “brought free speech back to America.” But since then, he has tested the limits of the First Amendment time and ...

First Amendment debates in 2026 are expected to focus on age verification, artificial intelligence, and academic freedom. Courts will likely continue to address campus speech, particularly concerning ...

Michelle Evans posted a photo of a transgender politician in a women's restroom in 2023, prompting an investigation under a state law barring distribution of images taken in restrooms without consent.

The end of 2025 and the arrival of 2026 means it's awards time – an opportunity to look back over last year's events and give credit where it's due. In that spirit, I offer this list of "First ...

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably ...

TALLAHASSEE — A federal judge Tuesday refused to dismiss most of a First Amendment lawsuit filed by a former Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission biologist who was fired because of a ...

Anti-ICE protesters line up on East 86th Street in Indianapolis Anti-ICE protesters line up on East 86th Street in Indianapolis 'Best time to be at IU': See fans in Bloomington during Peach Bowl ...

The midday Bible education program alleged that district policies violate the organization’s rights to freedom of speech and religious expression. EVERETT — An off-campus Bible education program sued ...

A gay pride rainbow flag flies along with the U.S. flag in front of a Methodist church. (Charlie Riedel/AP) (CN) — A federal judge dismissed on Friday Seattle Pacific University’s First Amendment ...

A preliminary injunction in federal court cited the First Amendment, handing a win to tech companies like Apple and Google. By Ryan Mac Ryan Mac reports on technology. A federal judge on Tuesday ...

Presumptively Protected. The Second Circuit initially concluded that Leroy’s message doesn’t fit within an unprotected category of speech. Although offensive, his post isn’t a true threat of violence.